Chain Link Fence Making Machine Jiaoyang Welding Industries Hebei Co., Ltd , https://www.jiaoyangmachine.com
Capacity and performance ratio tests play a crucial role in demonstrating the efficiency of photovoltaic (PV) plants to potential buyers or lenders, helping to mitigate risks associated with their investment. One widely recognized test is ASTM 2848-13, "Standard Test Method for Reporting Photovoltaic Non-Concentrator System Performance." This method aims to compare the modeled system performance against the actual operational output, ensuring that the system performs as expected, with a small margin of uncertainty. By adhering to a standardized test like ASTM E2848, which is overseen by a standards committee, it ensures consistent methodologies and minimum quality expectations.
Why is this significant for owners and financiers? Failed tests or delays in completing the testing phase can lead to penalties such as liquidated damages (LDs), particularly since this test typically takes place towards the conclusion of the development and construction phases.
How is the test carried out? At first glance, the process might appear straightforward, but the calculations involved are intricate, complex, and prone to errors.
Step 1 – Gathering Inputs
To prevent delays in executing the test, ensure all necessary materials are prepared. Key prerequisites for conducting this test include:
- A valid PVSYST model.
- Experience in regression modeling and access to a functional test sheet.
- A fully operational system with functioning equipment and calibrated weather stations.
- At least 5-7 days of system operation to collect sufficient data, depending heavily on prevailing weather conditions.
Step 2 – Exporting Data
With the inputs secured, prepare the data for analysis:
- Extract annual raw data from the PVSYST model. This should encompass Global Horizontal Irradiance (GHI), ambient temperature, wind speed, correction factors pertinent to calculating Plane of Array (POA) irradiance, and a timestamp for each data point.
- Retrieve climate and performance data from the data acquisition system. This raw data must include timestamps, production meter readings, temperature, wind speed, and POA irradiance.
- Review the mechanical and electrical drawings of the system. This step helps identify any unique issues impacting modeling, such as shading or severe inverter clipping.
Step 3 – Filtering Data for Quality
The most challenging part of the test involves filtering the data to eliminate low-quality or erroneous entries. The dataset must meet specific minimum requirements:
- At least 50 fifteen-minute data points or 750 minutes of data.
- Exclude data below 400W/m² and ensure it exceeds 98% of the inverter's rated capacity.
- Ensure reporting conditions for POA fall within a ±20% range.
- Although there are no strict rules for temperature or wind, exclusions can be made if they don't align with performance metrics.
Step 4 – Running the Regression
A regression model is executed to calculate power capacity and standard error. A successful test is achieved when the measured power-to-modeled power ratio exceeds 95%, with all regression errors under 5%.
Common pitfalls include:
- Depending on system design and season, collecting 50 valid data points meeting test quality standards may take a month or more.
- The test demands raw data from a PVSYST model capable of providing hourly requirements—simply using the summary PDF from PVSYST isn’t sufficient.
- Improper regression setups often occur during the initial attempt due to missing tools or tools improperly configured.
- Poor calibration of sensors, as the test's accuracy depends entirely on precise measurements.
Who Conducts This Complex Test?
Pure Power boasts an Owner’s Engineering division specializing in ASTM E2848 and other performance tests. As an independent third party, Pure Power ensures accurate, unbiased analysis following established protocols.
This explanation offers a comprehensive overview of the importance and execution of capacity and performance ratio tests, particularly in the context of PV systems. While seemingly technical, these steps underscore the meticulous attention to detail required to validate solar plant efficiency and reliability.